WLAN Fundamental - Channel Operation

Understanding how channels operate is key to avoiding interference and maximizing the performance/scalability of the WLAN. In radio communication, a wireless station (like a UniFi Access Point) receives a channel assignment and a specific bandwidth over which it transmits and receives signals to and from nearby stations. This channel assignment pertains to the center frequency of the first 20 MHz channel used by the station.

Channel bandwidth refers specifically to the frequency range over which data signals are  transmitted. However, the actual transmission signal generated by 802.11 radios looks similar to a volcano, where ‘peak’ power levels are spread across the channel bandwidth, and power levels drop off at the edges of the channel bandwidth near the ‘tail ends.’

The following figure demonstrates two APs in competing WLANs. The 20MHz WLAN (blue channel) is centered at frequency “f”, while the 40 MHz WLAN (yellow channel) actually bonds two 20 MHz channels together. Of the two 20MHz channels, the primary channel (centered at frequency “f”) contains the WLAN beacon announcements, while the secondary channel is optional for compatible, connecting Stations.

The ‘tail ends’ of adjacent channels can incur noise for nearby wireless networks. For this reason, it is very important to apply a channel planning pattern across the WLAN, to avoid co-channel interference (which reduces speeds and limits the scalability of the network).

The yellow WLAN depicted in the chalkboard graphic represents a ‘bonded’ 40 MHz channel (20+20) according to the 2009-802.11n standard. With bonded channels, 802.11n capable stations can communicate at higher data rates, called “High Throughput” (HT) rates. By comparison, the 802.11ac standard supports ‘bonded’ 80MHz channels (20+20+20+20) for “Very High Throughput” (VHT) data rates. A wireless network whose clients all support the same data rates is called ‘Greenfield’. For example, a greenfield VHT network would only be comprised of 802.11ac stations.

Channel availability depends on the world region where the radio will be deployed and is specified in the UniFi Controller under Country Site Settings. In 2.4 GHz deployment scenarios with multiple APs, use only 20 MHz bandwidths on channels 1, 6 and 11, since use of other channels (ex. 3, 5, 9) or larger bandwidths (ex. 40 MHz) overlaps with neighbor channels. In other words, channels 1,6, and 11 allow for proper channel re-use patterns. Contrast this with a channel plan that uses overlapping channels, as illustrated by the image below.

Given its worldwide support of an abundant number of channels, the 5 GHz band allows for more complex 20 MHz channel re-use patterns (as illustrated by the seven neighboring wireless cells. The wider range of available frequencies in the 5 GHz band also permits wider channel assignment (as illustrated in the previous graphic), including 40 and 80 MHz, for greater WLAN throughput. Because wider channel bandwidths require more channel space, be conscious limits the ability of the WLAN administrator to create effective channel re-use patterns across the wireless coverage area.

In order to minimize interference, assign non-adjacent channels to neighboring AP cells. When followed, the WLAN can scale more effectively. When disobeyed, WLANs cannot scale and result in poor performance (higher latency, lower throughput).

Before assigning WLAN channels, conduct site surveys to analyze noise levels across the spectrum. 2nd Generation 802.11ac UAPs feature RF Scan tools to help WLAN administrators decide the best channel, based on all sources of interference, including competing, in-band WLANs, EMI (electromagnetic interference), etc.

WLAN Fundamental - Unlicensed Radio Spectrum

As a worldwide, unlicensed radio spectrum, the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands allow virtually anyone to extend the range of networks with wireless access points. In spite of such universal availability, the unlicensed bands face problems from crowded use and inefficient channel assignments; both of which lead to increased co-channel interference. Faced with these issues, wireless administrators must pay close attention to details in order to plan for the most effective, efficient wireless network possible.

In the past, the 2.4 GHz band has been favored over 5 GHz due to its propagation characteristics. 2.4 GHz waveforms pass more easily through walls and reach clients at long distances. Over time however, the small range of unlicensed spectrum (approximately 83.5 MHz) belonging to the 2.4 GHz band has become overcrowded with competing access points. Furthermore, a prevalence of consumer devices (ex. cordless telephones, baby monitors, Bluetooth devices) using the same frequency range as the 2.4 GHz spectrum is considered ‘saturated.’

Compared to the 2.4 GHz spectrum, 5 GHz offers much more flexibility for wireless operators due to greater availability of spectrum and relaxed transmission power requirements. Although the 2.4 GHz band only allows for 3 reuse channels without overlap (1, 6 and 11), the 5 GHz band allows for as many as 24, depending on region (36, 40, 149, 153, etc.). Given the abundance of available channels and short-range propagation  characteristics, high-density WLANs benefit greatly from the 5 GHz band.

WLAN Fundamental - Wave Properties

In order to transmit data from one location to another, stations (wireless APs and client radios) generate energy in the form of electromagnetic waves, which travel at the speed of light. These electromagnetic waves operate at different frequencies, which are defined as the number of periodic cycles traversed per second. The frequency and wavelength of an  electromagnetic wave are inversely proportional and related by the speed of light:

Frequency is measured in Hertz (Hz), which individually represents one period, wavelength, or wave cycle. As a waveform travels from one point to another, it undergoes signal loss due to a phenomenon known as Free Space Path Loss (FSPL). However, lower frequencies (ex. 2.4 GHz) have much longer wavelengths and can propagate further than higher frequencies (ex. 5 GHz).

To relate the levels of energy associated with wireless receive signals, including attenuation (loss) of a wireless signal, we use decibels (dB). Decibels follow a logarithmic relationship where adding & subtracting decibels corresponds to exponential growth or reduction on the linear domain. Each time you add 3 dB or 10 dB, the value on the linear domain increases or decreases by a factor of x2 or x10, respectively.

The relationship between frequency and propagation is best illustrated by the Free Space Path Loss (FSPL) chart for 2.4 and 5 GHz waveforms. At a given distance, 5 GHz (the higher frequency) undergoes more attenuation. Therefore, 2.4 GHz WLANs are ideal for coverage scenarios, while 5 GHz are well-suited for density.

Different materials can affect the level of attenuation faced by wireless signals. For example, concrete attenuates wireless signals more than wood. Certain materials may also cause a wireless signal to propagate, or, ‘behave’ differently. For example, some metal surfaces can cause wireless signals to reflect, leading to less predictability throughout the WLAN environment. Other materials, like water (or people) can absorb wireless signals. Strategically, the construction of the WLAN environment can help or hinder how you design your wireless network.